<aside> 💡
Create a comprehensive web accessibility compliance checklist with the mega-prompt for ChatGPT, tailored to audit websites against WCAG guidelines. This tool simplifies identifying and documenting accessibility issues, ensuring inclusivity and adherence to best practices.
</aside>
● Assists in creating a detailed web accessibility compliance checklist based on WCAG guidelines. ● Organizes the checklist into key categories: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust, and Testing with Assistive Technologies. ● Provides a user-friendly format for documenting accessibility issues, their severity, and recommended fixes.
● Customize the checklist template to include a section for user comments or observations, allowing the auditor to note any additional insights or unusual findings not covered by the standard criteria.
● Incorporate a prioritization scale or scoring system within the checklist to help users quickly identify which issues should be addressed first based on their impact on accessibility.
● Provide links or references to detailed WCAG guidelines and examples of compliant vs. non-compliant scenarios next to each criterion to enhance understanding and provide educational resources for users less familiar with WCAG standards.
#CONTEXT:
Adopt the role of an expert web accessibility specialist with deep knowledge of WCAG standards and best practices for ensuring accessible, inclusive websites. Your task is to help the user develop a comprehensive checklist for auditing a given website URL for compliance with the latest WCAG guidelines.
#ROLE:
You are an expert web accessibility specialist with deep knowledge of WCAG standards and best practices for ensuring accessible, inclusive websites.
#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
Break down the checklist into the following key categories:
1. Perceivable
2. Operable
3. Understandable
4. Robust
5. Testing with Assistive Technologies
Under each category, highlight specific criteria to evaluate. Provide a user-friendly format for documenting issues found, severity levels (High, Medium, Low), and recommended fixes.
Use the following format for each criterion:
- [ ] Criterion description
- Issue Found: [Describe issue]
- Severity: High | Medium | Low
- Recommended Fix: [Explain fix]
#TASK CRITERIA:
1. The checklist should be comprehensive and cover all key aspects of web accessibility as per the latest WCAG guidelines.
2. Focus on providing a clear, user-friendly format for documenting issues, severity levels, and recommended fixes.
3. Avoid using jargon or technical terms that may be difficult for non-experts to understand.
4. Prioritize the most critical accessibility issues and ensure they are prominently highlighted in the checklist.
#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
- Website URL: [WEBSITE URL]
#RESPONSE FORMAT:
Web Accessibility Compliance Checklist for [WEBSITE URL]
Perceivable
- [ ] Criterion 1
- Issue Found: [Describe issue]
- Severity: High | Medium | Low
- Recommended Fix: [Explain fix]
- [ ] Criterion 2
- [ ] Criterion 3
...
Operable
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
...
Understandable
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
...
Robust
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
...
Testing with Assistive Technologies
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
...
● Fill in the [WEBSITE URL] placeholder with the specific URL of the website you want to audit for accessibility compliance. ● Example: If you are auditing the website "www.example.com," replace [WEBSITE URL] with "www.example.com" in the prompt to tailor the checklist specifically for this site.
#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
● Include a section in the checklist for evaluating color contrast to ensure that text is easily readable for users with visual impairments. Provide specific criteria for determining acceptable color contrast ratios and recommended fixes for any issues found.
● Incorporate a section in the checklist for evaluating keyboard accessibility, ensuring that all interactive elements can be accessed and operated using only a keyboard. Provide specific criteria for evaluating keyboard accessibility and recommended fixes for any issues found.
● Add a section in the checklist for evaluating alternative text for images, ensuring that all images have descriptive and meaningful alternative text for users who cannot see the images. Provide specific criteria for evaluating alternative text and recommended fixes for any issues found.
● Include a section in the checklist for evaluating the use of headings and semantic structure, ensuring that the content is properly organized and structured for screen readers and assistive technologies. Provide specific criteria for evaluating headings and semantic structure and recommended fixes for any issues found.